An economic analysis of management practices to mitigate butt rot and deer browse of planted western redcedar
Main Article Content
Keywords
butt rot, carbon, deer browsing, economics, forest management, Monte Carlo simulation, western redcedar, plantations
Abstract
We consider the economic feasibility of silviculture investments to reduce butt rot (through stump removal) and ungulate browse damage (stand establishment strategies), which are the most serious impacts to planted western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don) stands in coastal British Columbia, Canada. We find mixed support for these investments, even if carbon sequestration benefits are included. We do find butt rot causes significant material damage to volumes, but such damage tends to occur well into the future of the stand diminishing the negative impact on stand value. As such, given the high costs of stump removal, and despite losses of high-quality logs, we find little support for stump removal except under very low discount rates (2%). Deer browse impacts are found to occur in the early stages of stand development, and projected stands should sufficiently recover volumes and value by harvest age. However, under positive carbon prices, because deer browse mitigation measures have an immediate impact on biomass accumulation in the early stages of stand development, we find some conditions for which low-cost deer browse mitigation options might be economically supported on forestlands. Finally, we found that increased planting of seedlings is likely a low-cost, financially attractive option under a broad set of conditions, even on sites without risk to damage, meaning a possible no-regrets strategy to mitigate damages from either deer browse or decay. The benefits of planting highlight the feasibility of using tree breeding to increase growth, resistance to deer, decay, and drought. The methods developed in the paper to evaluate the impact of both root rot and ungulate browsing could be applied to other ecosystems elsewhere.
References
BCMF (British Columbia Ministry of Forests). 2023. Harvest billing system (web application). https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/hbs/ (Accessed May 18, 2023).
Boardman AE, Moore MA, Vining AR. 2010. The social discount rate for Canada based on future growth in consumption. Canadian Public Policy 36(3): 325-343. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.36.3.325
Bogdanski BEC, Cruickshank M, Di Lucca CM, Becker E. 2018. Stumping out tree root disease - An economic analysis of controlling root disease, including its effects on carbon storage in southern British Columbia, Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 409, 2018, Pages 129-147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.012
Booth I, Henigman J. 1996. Seedling barrier protection from deer and elk browse. B.C. Ministry of Forests Silviculture Practices Branch. Victoria, B.C. Available at: http://library.nrs.gov.bc.ca/digipub/SIL1996MR32.pdf.
Brunette M, Caurla S. 2016. An economic comparison of prevention strategies against Hylobius abietis and Heterobasidion annosum in the Landes de Gascogne Forest. Annals of Forest Science 73:777-787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0568-z
Buckland DC. 1946. Investigations of decay in western redcedar in British Columbia. Can. J. Res. C, 24: 158-181.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjr46c-018
Burns RM, Honkala B. 1990. Silvics of North America. Vol. 1, Conifers. USDA, U.S. For. Serv., Wash., D.C., Agric. Handbk. 654.
Clasen C, Griess VC, Knoke T. 2011. Financial consequences of losing admixed tree species: a new approach to value increased financial risks by ungulate browsing. Forest Policy and Economics 13 (6):503-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.005
Cockle A, Ettl G. 2010. Survival and growth of western redcedar and Douglas-fir planted in a variable retention harvest unit in the western Cascades, Washington. In: Harrington, Constance, A., A tale of two cedars - International symposium on western redcedar and yellow-cedar. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-828. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 177 p.
Cruickshank MG, Filipescu CN, Sturrock RN. 2018. The effect of stump removal and tree admixture on butt decay incidence, damage and wood density in western redcedar. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, Volume 20, Pages 368-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2018.1496143
Gonzalez JS. 2004. Growth, properties and uses of western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don). 2nd Edition. Co-published by Western Redcedar Lumber Association and Western Redcedar Export Association. Forintek Canada Corp. Special Publication No SP-37R.
Di Lucca CM. 1999. TASS/SYLVER/TIPSY: systems for predicting the impact of silvicultural practices on yield, lumber value, economic return and other benefits. In Colin R. Bamsey (editor). Stand density management conference: using the planning tools. Conference Proceedings. Alta. Env. Prot. pp. 7-16.
Griess V, Panwar R, Cool J. 2015. The potential of mixing timber assets to financially offset negative effects of deer browsing on western redcedar. The Forestry Chronicle 91(4): 436-443. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2015-073
Henigman J, Martinz M. 2002. Evaluation of deer browse barrier products to minimize mortality and growth loss to western redcedar. Final Report submitted to Husby Forest Products, Queen Charlotte Island Forest District, Western Forest Products Ltd., and Weyerhaeuser Canada Ltd. Available at: https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/library/documents/bib92949.pdf
Kimmey JW. 1956. Cull factors for sitka spruce, western hemlock, and western redcedar in southeast Alaska. Station Pap. No. 6. USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Forest Research Center. 31 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.66348
Klemperer WD. 1996. Forest resource economics and finance. McGraw-Hill, U.S. 551pp.
Kossoy A, Peszko G, Oppermann K, Prytz N, Klein N, Blok K, Lam L, Wong L, Borkent B. 2015. State and trends of carbon pricing 2015. State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/09/25053834/state-trends-carbon-pricing-2015.
Kurz WA, Dymond CC, White TM, Stinson G, Shaw CH, Rampley GJ, Smyth C, Simpson BN, Neilson ET, Trofymow JA, Metsaranta J, Apps MJ. 2009. CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards, Ecological Modelling, 220(4):480-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.10.018
McNay RS, Doyle DD. 1987. Winter habitat selection by black-tailed deer on Vancouver Island: a job completion report. Integrated Wildlife Intensive Forestry Research, BC Ministry of Environment and Parks and Ministry of Forests and Lands. IWIFR- 34. Victoria, B.C. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Mr/Iwr/Iwr034.pdf
Meidinger D, Pojar J. 1991. Ecosystems of British Columbia, Special Report Series No. 6. Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC.
Mitchell KJ. 1964. Height growth losses due to animal feeding in Douglas fir plantations, Vancouver Island B.C.. The Forestry Chronicle.40(3): 298-307. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc40298-3
Mitchell KJ. 1988. SYLVER: Modelling the impact of silviculture on yield, lumber value, and economic return. The Forestry Chronicle. 64(2): 127-131. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc64127b1-2
Morrison DJ, Cruickshank MG, Lalumière A. 2014. Control of laminated and Armillaria root disease by stump removal and tree species mixtures: Amount and cause of mortality and impact on yield after 40 years. Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 319, Pages 75-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.007
Parish R, Thomson S. 1995. The tree book: learning to recognize trees of British Columbia. 2nd ed. B.C. Min. For., Res. Br., Victoria, B.C. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/library/documents/treebook/ TreeBook.pdf (Accessed January 20, 2020).
Renzie CD, Han H-S. 2001. An operational comparison of partial cut and clearcut harvesting methods in old cedar-hemlock forests in central British Columbia, Robson Valley. Proceedings of Enhanced Forest Management Pilot Project (EFMPP) Information Session. 2001 Mar 15-16.
Russell J, Kimball B. 2010. Summary of western redcedar browse resistance research. In: Harrington, Constance, A., A tale of two cedars - International symposium on western redcedar and yellow-cedar. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-828. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 177 p.
Russell K, Johnsey R, Edmonds R. 1986. Disease and insect management for Douglas fir. In Douglas fir: stand management for the future. Eds. Oliver, C.D., Hanley, D.P., Johnson, J.A. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Institute of Forest Resources, Contribution. 55. Ch. 26: 189-207.
Self M, MacKenzie M. 1995. Intensive site-preparation to control armillaria root disease in second-rotation Pinus radiata. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 25(1):111-116.
Stein WI. 1997. Ten-year survival and growth of planted Douglas-fir and western redcedar after seven site-preparation treatments. Western J. Appl. For., 12, pp. 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/12.3.74
Sturrock RN, Braybrooks AV, Reece PF. 2017. Decay of living western redcedar. Information Report FI-X-014, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Canadian Wood Fibre Centre.
van der Kamp BJ. 1975. The distribution of microorganisms associated with decay of western redcedar. Can. J. For. Res. 5(1): 61-67.
https://doi.org/10.1139/x75-008
van der Kamp BJ. 1986. Effects of heartwood inhabiting fungi on thujaplicin content and decay resistance of western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn). Wood and Fiber Sc. 18(3):421-427.
van Kooten CG, Binkley CS, Delcourt G. 1995. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77:365-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243546
Viitala EJ. 2016. Faustmann formula before Faustmann in German territorial states. Forest Policy and Economics 65: 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.004
Vourc'h G, Vila B, Gillon D, Escarré J, Guibal F, Fritz H, Clausen TP, Martin JL. 2002 Disentangling the causes of damage variation by deer browsing on young Thuja plicata. Oikos 98: 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980209.x
Ward AI, White PCL, Smith A, Critchley CH, 2004, Modelling the cost of roe deer browsing damage to forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 191: 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.12.018
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the journal. The journal retains no copyright.
