Evaluating the impact of wood flow management software on administrative costs and efficiency for wood suppliers in the Southeastern U.S.: a case study of Timber Resource Analytics and Contract Tracking software
Main Article Content
Keywords
administration, efficiency, logistics, supply chain, wood supplier
Abstract
The southeastern U.S. forest industry serves as a crucial source of raw materials for construction and paper production for the global economy. However, this industry faces persistent challenges in wood supply chain management, often centered around logistical inefficiencies and administrative burdens. Additionally, increased operational overhead, due to rising costs, has exerted strain on the business success of wood suppliers. Administrative procedures and record keeping have traditionally been a labor-intensive process for this sector of the wood supply chain. However, technological solutions, such as new wood flow and logistics management software, can enhance efficiency and cost-effectiveness of these procedures. This research investigated the impact of wood flow management software on administrative costs for southeastern U.S. wood suppliers. Utilizing a case study approach, we compared administrative time and cost savings of software users and non-software users, to determine potential financial benefits of software adoption. The research design centered on gathering insight from both user groups, through individual interviews, allowing for a comparative analysis of the software’s efficiency metrics. Results indicated that wood suppliers who utilized software saved an average of 43 hours per week on administrative tasks, resulting in estimated annual savings of approximately $62,000 United States dollars (USD). The greatest reported time and cost savings were attributed to scheduling jobs and organizing information. Adoption of wood flow logistics software may result in additional monetary savings through increased efficiency in administrative procedures and communications. These research findings will be useful to wood suppliers interested in improving operational efficiency and reducing administrative costs.
References
Bettinger P, Merry K, Fei S, Weiskittel A, Ma Z. 2023. Usefulness and need for digital technology to assist forest management: Summary of findings from a survey of Registered Foresters. Journal of Forestry. 121(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac028
Bowman T, Jeffers S, Naka K. 2023. Characteristics and concerns of logging businesses in the Southeastern United States: Results from a state-wide survey from Alabama. Forests. 14(9):1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091695
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2022 (May). State occupational employment and wage estimates. [Updated 2023 April 25]. Retrieved September 5, 2023 from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oessrcst.htm
Conrad, JLIV. 2021. Evaluating profitability of individual timber deliveries in the US South. Forests. 12(4), 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040437
Conrad JLIV. 2022. Log truck insurance premiums, claims, and safety practices among logging businesses in the US South. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 34(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2124704
Conrad JLIV, Dahlen J. 2019. Productivity and cost of processors in whole-tree harvesting systems in southern pine stands. Forest Science. 65:767-775. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxz036
Conrad JLIV, Greene WD, Hiesl P. 2018. The evolution of logging businesses in Georgia 1987-2017 and South Carolina 2012-2017. Forest Science. 64(6), 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxy020
Conrad JLIV, Greene WD, Hiesl P. 2024. Georgia and Florida logging businesses persevere through pandemic, rising costs, and uncertainty. Forest Science. 70(1):47-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxad050
Conrad JLIV, Vokoun MM, Prisley SP, Bolding MC.2017.Barriers to logging production and efficiency in Wisconsin. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 28 (1):57-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2017.1246890
Dabbene F, Gay P, Tortia C. 2014. Traceability issues in food supply chain management: A review. Biosystems Engineering. 120:65-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.09.006
Fleming A, Jakku E, Lim-Camacho L, Taylor B, Thorburn P. 2018. Is big data for big farming or for everyone? perceptions in the Australian grains industry. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 38(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0501-y
Flick WA. 1985. The wood dealer system in Mississippi: An essay on regional economics and culture. Journal of Forest History. 29(3), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/4004824
Francis OB, Visser R. 2017. Operational efficiency analysis of New Zealand timber harvesting contractors using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 28 (2):85-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2017.1313489
Francisco K, Swanson D. 2018. The supply chain has no clothes: Technology adoption of blockchain for supply chain transparency. Logistics. 2(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2010002
Gualandris J, Klassen RD, Vachon S, Kalchschmidt M. 2015. Sustainable evaluation and verification in supply chains: Aligning and leveraging accountability to stakeholders. Journal of Operations Management. 38:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.06.002
Greene WD, Mayo JH, deHoop CF, Egan AF. 2004. Causes and costs of unused logging production capacity in the southern United States and Maine. Forest Products Journal. 54(5):29¬-37.
Hamsley AK, Greene WD, Siry JP, Mendell BC. 2007. Improving timber trucking performance by reducing variability of log truck weights. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 31(1):12-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/31.1.12
He M, Smidt M, Li W, Zhang Y. 2021. Logging industry in the United States: Employment and profitability. Forests. 12(12):1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121720
Kaulen A, Stopfer L, Lippert K, Purfürst T. 2023. Systematics of forestry technology for tracing the timber supply chain. Forests. 14(9):1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091718
Knight CRD, Bolding MC, Conrad JLIV, Barrett SM. 2024. Log truck transportation challenges and innovative solutions: evaluating the perspectives of truck drivers, logging business owners, and foresters. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 35(1):120-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2023.2273123
LeBel L. 1993. Production capacity utilization in the southern logging industry [dissertation]. [Blacksburg (VA)]: Virginia Tech. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/items/6a547dee-e9fb-4a24-9762-1d71bd13bedf
Mei B, Clutter ML, Harris TG. 2013. Timberland return drivers and timberland returns and risks: A simulation approach. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 37(1):18-25. https://doi.org/10.5849/sjaf.11-022
Reddish RP, Baker SA, Greene WD. 2011. Improving log trucking efficiency by using in-woods scales. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 35(4):178-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/35.4.178
Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 (O JL 150, 31.05.2023).
Silversides CR, Sundberg B. 1989. Operational efficiency in forestry: Vol. 2: Practice. Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0506-6_2
Stopfer L, Kaulen A, Purfürst T. 2024. Potential of blockchain technology in wood supply chains. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 216:108496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108496
Timber Mart-South. 2023. U.S. South Annual Review: 2023. Timber Mart-South. University of Georgia, Center for Forest Business. [cited 2024 January 19]. Retrieved from http://www.timbermart-south.com/index.html
Zhang X, Sun C, Munn IA, Gordon J. 2021. How to protect the U.S. forest products industry from the perspective of trade? A comparison of policies within the Forest Supply Chain. Forest Policy and Economics. 133:102616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102616
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in the journal. The journal retains no copyright.
